This is the place Colorado stands with COVID-19

DENVER (KDVR) —  Hospitalizations for COVID-19 are rising in Colorado. The most recent information from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment exhibits that there have been 1427 hospitalizations for RSV since Oct. 1, 517 hospitalizations for influenza since Oct. 1, and there are 121 common each day hospitalizations for COVID-19 as of Nov. 30.

This can be a chart from CDPHE displaying new hospital admissions for COVID-19:

COVID-19 circumstances

As of Monday, the state’s seven-day positivity price was 12.6%, which is up from 12.1% per week in the past. The positivity price measures the quantity of COVID constructive checks in comparison with the whole quantity of checks taken.

There are 16 counties within the state with a excessive group stage over the past week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mentioned.

1. Archuleta County
2. Boulder County
3. Broomfield County
4. Dolores County
5. Eagle County
6. Fremont County
7. Garfield County
8. La Plata County
9. Mesa County
10. Montezuma County
11. Phillips County
12. Pitkin County
13. Pueblo County
14. Rio Blanco County
15. San Juan County
16. Sedgwick County

The CDC mentioned communities with a high community level of COVID-19 ought to do the next:

In response to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, incidence charges have risen over the past seven days.

Right here’s a take a look at positivity rates for every county over the last seven days:

• Adams: 12.3% (down over final week)
• Alamosa: 14.5% (up over final week)
• Arapahoe: 12.6% (up over final week)
• Archuleta: 15.9% (down over final week)
• Baca: 7.7% (down over final week)
• Bent: 18.2% (up over final week)
• Boulder: 12% (down over final week)
• Broomfield: 13.1% (down over final week)
• Chaffee: 10.2% (up over final week)
• Cheyenne: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Clear Creek: 14.3% (down over final week)
• Conejos: 16.7% (up over final week)
• Costilla: 12.5% (up over final week)
• Crowley: 0.0% (Similar)
• Custer: 21.4% (up over final week)
• Delta: 7.1% (down over final week)
• Denver: 12.3% (up over final week)
• Dolores: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Douglas: 11.8% (up over final week)
• Eagle: 14.9% (up over final week)
• El Paso: 13.9% (up over final week)
• Elbert: 6.9% (down over final week)
• Fremont: 14.1% (down over final week)
• Garfield: 15.9% (up over final week)
• Gilpin: 17.4% (up over final week)
• Grand: 16% (up over final week)
• Gunnison: 5.5% (down over final week)
• Hinsdale: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Huerfano: 13% (up over final week)
• Jackson: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Jefferson: 10.9% (up over final week)
• Kiowa: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Package Carson: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• La Plata: 16.8% (down over final week)
• Lake: 21.1% (up over final week)
• Larimer: 14.5% (up over final week)
• Las Animas: 9.8% (up over final week)
• Lincoln: 46.7% (up over final week)
• Logan: 7.6% (down over final week)
• Mesa: 15.9% (down over final week)
• Mineral: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Moffat: 11.2% (down over final week)
• Montezuma: 23.9% (down over final week)
• Montrose: 8% (down over final week)
• Morgan: 12% (up over final week)
• Otero: 4.8% (identical)
• Ouray: 31.6% (up over final week)
• Park: 14.5% (identical)
• Phillips: 37% (up over final week)
• Pitkin: 27.8% (up over final week)
• Prowers: 3.6% (down over final week)
• Pueblo: 13.1% (up over final week)
• Rio Blanco: 9.9% (down over final week)
• Rio Grande: 4.8% (down over final week)
• Routt: 18.1% (up over final week)
• Saguache: 9.1% (down over final week)
• San Juan: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• San Miguel: Fewer than 10 checks prior to now week
• Sedgwick: 30.8% (up over final week)
• Summit: 29.3% (up over final week)
• Teller: 17.3% (up over final week)
• Washington: 5.9% (down over final week)
• Weld: 13.7% (up over final week)
• Yuma: 13.8% (up over final week)

What’s the positivity %?

In response to Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the % constructive is strictly what it appears like: the share of all coronavirus checks carried out which can be truly constructive, or: (constructive checks)/(complete checks) x 100%. The % constructive (generally known as the “% constructive price” or “positivity price”) helps public well being officers reply questions such as:

• What’s the present stage of SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) transmission locally?
• Are we doing sufficient testing for the quantity of people who find themselves getting contaminated?

The % constructive shall be excessive if the variety of constructive checks is just too excessive, or if the variety of complete checks is just too low. A better % constructive suggests larger transmission and that there are seemingly extra folks with coronavirus locally who haven’t been examined but, Johns Hopkins shared.