Go away Journey Concession Is For Journey Inside India; TDS To Be Deduced From LTC If International Go to Is Concerned : Supreme Court docket

The Supreme Court docket has noticed that Go away Journey Concession (LTC) isn’t for overseas journey and is supposed for journey inside India.

The second workers undertake journey with a overseas leg, it’s not a journey inside India and therefore not lined underneath the provisions of Part 10(5) of the Revenue Tax Act.

The courtroom dismissed the attraction filed by State Financial institution of India towards the Delhi Excessive Court docket judgment which held that the quantity obtained by the SBI workers in the direction of their LTC claims isn’t chargeable for the exemption as these workers had visited overseas. The Income had held SBI to be an “assessee in default”, for not deducting the tax at supply of its workers.

Part 10(5) of the Revenue Tax Act exempts from the ‘complete earnings’ the funds obtained as LTC. Clause (5) reads as follos : Within the case of a person, the worth of any journey concession or help obtained by, or because of him,— (a) from his employer for himself and his household, in connection along with his continuing on go away to anyplace in India.

In attraction, the SBI admitted that the journey made by its workers underneath LTC did contain a overseas leg and admittedly a circuitous route versus the shortest route was taken. However it was identified that (1) the staff did journey from one designated place in India to a different place inside India (although of their journey itinerary a overseas nation was additionally concerned), and (2) the funds which have been truly made to those workers was for the shortest route of their journey between two designated locations inside India. In different phrases, no cost was made for overseas journey although a overseas leg was part of the itinerary undertaken by these workers.

The bench rejected each these contentions and made the next observations:

LTC is for journey inside India, from one place in India to a different place in India

“The competition of the Appellant that there is no such thing as a particular bar underneath Part 10(5) for a overseas journey and due to this fact a overseas journey could be availed so long as the beginning and vacation spot factors stay inside India can be with out deserves. LTC is for journey inside India, from one place in India to a different place in India. There must be no ambiguity on this… The second argument urged by the appellant that funds made to those workers was of the shortest route of their precise journey can’t be accepted both. It has already been clarified above, that in view of the provisions of the Act, the second workers undertake journey with a overseas leg, it’s not a journey inside India and therefore not lined underneath the provisions of Part 10(5) of the Act.

A overseas journey additionally frustrates the fundamental goal of LTC.

A overseas journey additionally frustrates the fundamental goal of LTC. The fundamental goal of the LTC scheme was to familiarise a civil servant or a Authorities worker to achieve some perspective of Indian tradition by touring on this huge nation. It is for that reason that the sixth Pay Fee rejected the demand of paying money compensation in lieu of LTC and likewise rejected the demand of overseas journey…There was no intention of legislature to permit the staff to journey overseas within the garb of LTC obtainable by advantage of Part 10(5) of the Act. Subsequently, the Income has a legitimate objection (other than different objections that are clearly violative of the Statute), that the intention and goal of the scheme can be violated within the garb of tour inside India, overseas journey is being availed.

Employer can not declare ignorance in regards to the journey plans of its workers

The courtroom noticed that SBI can not declare ignorance in regards to the journey plans of its workers as throughout settlement of LTC Payments the entire information can be found earlier than the assessee in regards to the particulars of their workers’ travels.

“Subsequently, it can’t be a case of bonafide mistake, as all of the related information have been earlier than the Assessee employer and he was due to this fact totally able to calculate the ‘estimated earnings’ of its workers. The competition of Shri Ok.V. Vishwanathan, realized senior advocate that there could also be a bonafide mistake by the assessee-employer in calculating the ‘estimated earnings’ can’t be accepted since all of the related paperwork and materials have been earlier than the assessee- employer on the related time and the assessee employer due to this fact should have utilized his thoughts and deducted tax at supply because it was his statutory obligation, underneath Part 192(1) of the Act.”, the courtroom added.

The courtroom famous that most of the workers had undertaken journey to Port Blair through Malaysia, Singapore or Port Blair through Bangkok, Malaysia or Rameswaram through Mauritius or Madurai through Dubai, Thailand and Port Blair through Europe and so on.

It is vitally tough to understand as to how the appellant who’s the assessee-employer might have did not take note of this facet. This was the elephant within the room, the courtroom stated.

Case particulars

State Financial institution of India vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue Tax | 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 917 | CA 8181 OF 2022 | 4 November 2022 | CJI UU Lalit, Justices Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia

Headnotes

Revenue Tax Act, 1961 ; Part 10(5) , 192(1) – Revenue Tax Guidelines, 1962 ; Rule 2B – Attraction towards Delhi HC Judgment holding that quantity obtained by SBI workers in the direction of their Go away Journey Concession (LTC) claims isn’t chargeable for the exemption as these workers had visited overseas international locations which isn’t permissible underneath the legislation – Dismissed – LTC isn’t for overseas journey – The journey should be achieved from one designated place in India to a different designated place inside India – The second workers undertake journey with a overseas leg, it’s not a journey inside India and therefore not lined underneath the provisions of Part 10(5) – Employer can not declare ignorance in regards to the journey plans of its workers as throughout settlement of LTC Payments the entire information can be found earlier than the assessee in regards to the particulars of their workers’ travels. Subsequently, it can’t be a case of bonafide mistake.

Click here to Read/Download Judgment