Celebrity News, Exclusives, Photos and Videos

Celebrity

Linda Evangelista the worst celeb to work with, claims publicist


“Linda Evangelista was positively the worst,” says publicist Max Markson of working with the supermodel. Picture / Getty Photographs

Superstar publicist Max Markson has revealed the worst expertise he has had working with a star.

Markson, who based the PR company MarksonSparks, mentioned iconic Canadian supermodel Linda Evangelista “was positively the worst” star he has handled, recalling a selected incident in 1996 the place he believed she dressed inappropriately for a launch occasion for a treadmill endorsed by Ita Buttrose.

“I should not say this however Linda Evangelista was positively the worst,” he mentioned on a current look on the Life, Cash & Love podcast hosted by Dylan Mullan.

Max Markson, right, has worked with a number of celebrities including Arnold Schwarzenegger. Photo / Getty Images
Max Markson, proper, has labored with a lot of celebrities together with Arnold Schwarzenegger. Picture / Getty Photographs

Markson mentioned he suggested Evangelista to put on “one thing to go on the treadmill after which develop into one thing lovely”, solely to have her arrive on the occasion wearing a hoodie, shorts and a T-shirt.

“The following day, my cellphone begins ringing at six o’clock, which at all times means there’s one thing improper,” Markson continued.

“And Linda desires to offer me a proper mouthful, which she does, as a result of in The Sydney Morning Herald that day, it mentioned: “Linda Evangelista was dressed like she was going out to wash the john [toilet] on a Sunday morning.”‘

“She went berserk at me! Not that I wrote the story, however as a result of I hadn’t suggested her what to put on. And there was no level in attempting to inform her that I did.”

Lately, Evangelista graced the entrance cowl of British Vogue journal after revealing she was left “brutally disfigured” by a botched magnificence therapy.

Linda Evangelista on the cover of British Vogue's September issue. Photo / Vogue
Linda Evangelista on the duvet of British Vogue’s September concern. Picture / Vogue

The supermodel mannequin has been in “hiding” for the previous six years after claiming she was left “completely deformed” by a uncommon response to a preferred beauty therapy.

Evangelista filed a US$50 million (NZD$83 million) damages lawsuit in opposition to Zeltiq Aesthetics, the corporate behind CoolSculpting – a fat-freezing process carried out globally, together with right here in Australia – in September, alleging she developed paradoxical adipose hyperplasia or PAH, a threat she says she wasn’t made conscious of earlier than having the process.

However after retaining a low profile since having the process in 2016, the 57-year-old has simply landed the September cowl of the distinguished British style magazine.

Evangelista made an effort to emphasize that her face, jaw and neck had been taped again.

“That is not my jaw and neck in actual life – and I can not stroll round with tape and elastics in every single place,” she mentioned within the accompanying interview.

” what, I am attempting to like myself as I’m, however look, for images I at all times suppose we’re right here to create fantasies.

“We’re creating goals. I feel it is allowed. Additionally, all my insecurities are taken care of in these footage, so I’ve bought to do what I like to do.”

Evangelista additionally mentioned the high-profile gig, which comes simply weeks after she posed for a brand new promoting marketing campaign for Italian style home Fendi, was not “a comeback”.

“Am I cured mentally? Completely not. However I am so grateful for the help I bought from my mates and from my business…,” she informed Vogue.

“You are not going to see me in a swimsuit, that is for certain. It’ll be tough to seek out jobs with issues protruding from me; with out retouching, or squeezing into issues, or taping issues or compressing or tricking.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *